Catalog Number S-05-080-120-6F |
Device Problems
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/23/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a 5x80 mm supera stent was unable to cross the target lesion due to anatomy.Two other supera stents (5x80, 5x100) were used, but the patient went to surgery.The supera stent (5x80) that failed to cross the lesion is not related to the patient going to surgery.Additional event details, including the reason for surgery, are pending.Reportedly, the physician who used the supera stents has not been trained on how to use this device.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
The initial information received indicated there were three supera stents involved.Subsequent to the previously filed medwatch report, additional information was received indicating that there was no third stent involved.The 80 length supera stent failed to cross the anatomy and there was no serious injury that resulted (part 1).After the failure to cross, one 100 length supera stent (part 2) was implanted, then surgically explanted.This device (part s-05-080-120-6f/lot 02099059) was not used in the procedure and no event occurred involving this device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The other device is being filed under a separate medwatch mfr number.The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Correction: it was initially reported that three supera stents were involved and were returning; however, subsequent information revealed there were only two supera stents involved - the failure to cross 80 length and the explanted 100 length.No investigation will be performed.This incident, part sequence 3 should not have been filed and it is a duplicate of the failure to cross part sequence.However, since an initial mdr has been filed for the patient going to surgery, this will remain reportable.The other device referenced (100 length, part 2) was filed under a separate medwatch mfr number, 2024168-2014-00940.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|