• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE FILTERWIRE EZ?; TEMPORARY CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT FOR EMBOLIC PROTECTION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE FILTERWIRE EZ?; TEMPORARY CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT FOR EMBOLIC PROTECTION Back to Search Results
Model Number H749201001900
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 09/27/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the tip of the device split in two.A 190 cm filterwire ez was selected to treat the target lesion.During preparation, it was noted that the tip of the filterwire was damaged and split in two.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient¿s status is fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: device was retuned for analysis.A visual and microscopic examination was performed and found that the radiopaque distal tip of the protection wire was found slightly curved.It was not wavy, or stretched.The filter bag was found retracted into the delivery sheath with 4 mm of the nosecone exposed.The filter bag was successfully deployed and then retracted; the filter bag was observed to be in good condition and met specification.The peel away test was also performed successfully, no anomalies were observed.The inner wire was found broken at the distal solder joint, but not detached.Three mm of the wire was found protruding out of the coil.No discoloration was observed indicating overheating during soldering.Evidence of solder on the broken end of the wire was found, and no kinks or dents that could have weakened the wire were found.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event occurred without direct patient contact.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the tip of the device split in two.A 190cm filterwire ez was selected to treat the target lesion.During preparation, it was noted that the tip of the filterwire was damaged and split in two.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status is fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILTERWIRE EZ?
Type of Device
TEMPORARY CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT FOR EMBOLIC PROTECTION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE
150 baytech drive
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE
150 baytech drive
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer Contact
ingrid matte
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key3634637
MDR Text Key3984142
Report Number2134265-2014-01077
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NFA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K061332
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/22/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/19/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/22/2015
Device Model NumberH749201001900
Device Catalogue Number20100-190
Device Lot Number16114083
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/29/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/03/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/22/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-