No dimensional discrepancies were identified and all material and processing certifications were to specification.Visual evaluation of the returned peek component identified that the snap features were damaged and there was a blind hole drilled in the back of the implant.There were forcep marks in several locations of the peek including along the damaged snap feature areas.It is not known if the snap feature was damaged by the forceps during removal or during initial insertion.From surgeon description, he had several problems with angling the construct in place and the trajectory of the drilled hole indicates that the drill guides and plate holder were not at the correct angles to the patient's vertebral endplates.The description of the difficulty in viewing the construct due to the patient's shoulders in addition to the angles of the drilled hole suggest patient anatomy was interfering with proper positioning of the construct but no definitive conclusion can be made.This is the first report of this type with the in:c2 system and will be monitored for future occurrences.Note:.
|