Catalog Number 04.641.002 |
Device Problem
Sticking (1597)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/03/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The surgeon was performing a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib exchange procedure.The surgeon exchanged the lumbar extension rod as it was expanded all the way.The surgeon applied the small stature rib hook and needed to remove it to bend the lumbar extension more.The hook would not remove and the surgeon assessed the set screw was broken somehow.The surgeon removed the entire device and did not replace it.Prior to the rib hook the table top cutter broke at the thread of the handle while cutting the rod.The universal spine system handle broke while trying to load a universal spine system stick to screw.There was no reported patient harm.There was a 20 minute delay in the procedure.The procedure was completed successfully.The patient status/outcome is reported as satisfactory.This is report 6 of 6 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment and not diagnosis.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The investigation could not be completed, no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A review of the device history records has been requested.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: a product evaluation was performed and the investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: a small titanium rib hook (part 04.641.002, lot 7495437) was returned attached to a titanium proximal extension size 5, 04_641_002_1 rev c) and there were no design changes required, and no changes have been made to the design since this part was released to the warehouse in october of 2013.The material is also found to be suitable for its intended use.The technique guide was also reviewed ((b)(4)).This complaint is confirmed, however the design and materials were found to be adequate for the intended use and did not contribute to the complaint condition.If the proper rib hook holder, veptr nut driver shaft and 5nm torque limiting handle were used in this procedure, then the nut should not have ended up over tightened and stripped to the point that the proximal extension could not be removed.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: a review of device history records for manufacturing revealed no complaint related issues.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|