In this event a patient alleged that on (b)(6) 2010, shortly after a cavitron unit was turned on and inserted into his mouth that he complained to a hygienist that the unit was "extremely loud" and was causing pain.The same day, the patient claimed to have experienced a persistent ringing in his ears.Around (b)(6) 2010, the patient was diagnosed with tinnitus from acoustic trauma.
|
Because evaluation of the unit involved is not possible and since this issue could necessitate medical/surgical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or permanent impairment of a body function, it must be presumed that the device malfunctioned and that the malfunction would be likely to cause/contribute to a serious injury should it recur.As such, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.The device was not returned for evaluation and the serial number was not provided for a dhr review.
|