• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VERATHON MEDICAL ULC GLIDESCOPE AVL VIDEO BATON 3-4; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VERATHON MEDICAL ULC GLIDESCOPE AVL VIDEO BATON 3-4; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Blood Loss (2597)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
After multiple attempts, the facility reps refused to provide any further info on the pt or details of the event.The relationship of the device usage to any blood loss or asphyxiation risk could not be confirmed.Eval summary: an inspection and testing of the device showed that it was working normally.There was no problem with led brightness in comparison to another avl baton.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GLIDESCOPE AVL VIDEO BATON 3-4
Type of Device
VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
VERATHON MEDICAL ULC
burnaby, bc
CA 
Manufacturer (Section G)
VERATHON MEDICAL ULC
2227 douglas rd
burnaby, bc V5C 5A9
CA   V5C 5A9
Manufacturer Contact
adam gaines, sr specialist
20001 north creek pkwy
bothell, WA 98011
4256295606
MDR Report Key3723704
MDR Text Key4330194
Report Number9615393-2014-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/03/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Date Manufacturer Received12/05/2013
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-