• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB PARKER BATH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB PARKER BATH Back to Search Results
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Shelf Life Exceeded (1567); Maintenance Does Not Comply To Manufacturers Recommendations (2974)
Patient Problems Abrasion (1689); Skin Tears (2516)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ref # imp (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).When reviewing similar reportable events for parker bath, we have found low number of other cases with similar fault description - pt sustained skin tear because air jet cup.We have been able to establish that there is very low and decreasing trend that concerns this kind of events.Please note that arjohuntleigh manufactured over (b)(4) parker baths to date.With the amount of sold devices and with comparison to the daily use of them there is no particular trend observed for reportable complaints with this failure mode on parker bath.The device was inspected by an arjohuntleigh rep at the customer site and found to be out of specification.The device was being used for pt handling and in that way contributed to the event.From the info rec'd friction burn (abrasion) occurred to the pt as a result of this incident.Pt didn't need hospitalization or treatment because of event, only a dressing was placed on the blister.Described incident and occurred injury have been evaluated by clinical expert (please see conversation attached to complaint file), who stated that above injury is not serious.Risk analysis also refers to described event where serious injury can occur, because of this potential we have decided to consider this complaint to be reportable to the us authorities, but not to the (b)(4) due to the med dev requirements (exceeded lifetime).From above findings we conclude that this incident was caused by a combination of use error - bath wasn't prepared correctly between two baths as recommended in ifu and worn out equipment - the nozzle and cap should be changed at the same time as confirmed by the service technician.Please note also that this device was in use for over 13 yrs.The expected life of this equipment, unless otherwise stated, is ten (10) yrs (from the latest version of instructions for use, however because of similar design to complained bath and the same functionality, life time would be the same for old and new models of parker bath).The issue will be monitored through the arjohuntleigh complaint handling system to closely f/u the need for possible actions.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PARKER BATH
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB
verkstadsvagen 5
eslov 2412 1
SW  24121
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB
verkstadsvagen 5
eslov 2412 1
SW   24121
Manufacturer Contact
pamela wright
12625 wetmore
ste 308
san antonio, TX 78247
2103170412
MDR Report Key3737953
MDR Text Key16013085
Report Number9611530-2014-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ILM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Date Manufacturer Received02/25/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2000
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-