• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 3116
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Device Overstimulation of Tissue (1991); Twitching (2172); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Malaise (2359); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 10/08/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported the internal neurostimulator (ins) was defective.It was noted the patient had a shocking or jolting sensation since implant.It was reported the shocking had gotten worse over time.It was noted moving the leads and ins in (b)(6) 2013 helped the issue for four months, then shocking started and therapy was not working.It was reported the ins was turned off on (b)(6) 2014 and a temporary device was put in.It was noted the ins was turned back on and increased on (b)(6) 2014.It was reported the patient experienced vomiting, diarrhea, inability to eat, and dehydration on (b)(6) 2014.It was noted turning stimulation down resolved the vomiting.It was reported the patient thought the issue stemmed from overstimulation, but their healthcare provider disagreed.It was noted the patient felt really sick.It was reported the patient¿s ins was to be replaced as soon as possible.It was noted the patient¿s stomach was getting shocked, did a ¿funny, hard twitching,¿ then constrict and let go for extended periods of time.It was reported the patient was scheduled for replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014.It was noted the patient was hospitalized for the vomiting and diarrhea.It was reported the patient¿s trial worked ¿awesome¿ and the implant had shocked since implant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products: product id 435135, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, explanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 435135, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 4351-35, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 435135, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, explanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was later reported that ever since the patient got their pacemaker they did not gain any weight and they had to go on a feeding tube.It was stated, the device would shock the patient and the reporter could see when the patient was getting shocked.It was noted at the (b)(6), they turned it up a little and then they had non-stop vomiting and diarrhea and lost 6 pounds in 2 days and was at a hospital.It was stated, the patient had their device and leads replaced in (b)(6) and they have been fine and had not had to touch it.It was noted that since the replacement the patient gained 8 pounds, had no episodes, and no adjustments since.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the patient's old ins malfunctioned and was giving the patient problems since the day they had it put in.The patient weighed (b)(6), had bowel obstructions, vomited all the time, had severe diarrhea, and lost 8 lbs in 3 days with the old device.Since they replaced it, the patient gained (b)(6).The patient was a normal kid now and didn't even need to take any of their medication anymore.They had to reprogram it 1 times since they put it in and it was working great.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: neurostimulator (ins) (b)(4) stimulation ins functionally okay, insignificant anomalies.Lead (b)(4) no significant anomaly stim lead body cut through product segment.Lead (b)(4) no significant anomaly stim lead body cut through product segment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, explanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type: lead.Product id 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.Product id 4351-35, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.Product id 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, explanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type: lead.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the cause of the event was unknown.Surgical intervention of replacement of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) and leads took place on (b)(6) 2014.It was noted that reprogramming occurred multiple times.The patient did not require hospitalization due to the event and the patient recovered without sequelae.Additional information received reported that it was not normal battery depletion and there was no patient death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key3756778
MDR Text Key4550983
Report Number3004209178-2014-07417
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,consumer,health profess
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/27/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/17/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2013
Device Model Number3116
Device Catalogue Number3116
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/25/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/22/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age00013 YR
-
-