• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MITEK ACL IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MITEK ACL IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK INTRAFIX
Device Problem Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204)
Patient Problem Surgical procedure, repeated (2042)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(4).Reference: almazan a, herrera jp, chaidez c, cruz f, perez f, ibarra c.A complication of soft tissue graft tibial fixation with the intrafix device.Med sci monit.2009 jan;15(1):cs19-21.(b)(6).Patient characteristics: age: 43; gender: male; index operation: aclr (hamstring graft), chronic tear; devices: rigidfix + peek intrafix before 8 wks.Time of complication: before 8 wks.Type of complication: femoral tunnel screw divergence and migration.Joint: knee.Device: peek intrafix.Suture: na.Other devices: na.Signs and symptoms: progressive loss of extension: 10 degree vs.0 degree post-op, pain, crepitus in the antero-medial aspect of right knee (knee was stable) tissue damage: healthy looking acl graft which was impinged by fibrous tissue, tip of intrafix in the medial tibia plateau (mtp), implant was outside the original tibial tunnel and created a false way, 1.5x1.5 cm grade iii chondral injury on the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle (mfc).Imaging studies: x-ray: adequate tunnel position and no other finding.Reoperation (related/unrelated): excision of screw with forceps.Medical treatment: antibiotics (but no infection).F/u time: 1 wk.Imaging studies: na.Objective outcomes: wound healed, no infection.Functional outcomes: na.Subjective outcomes: na.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Mitek medical safety department discovered this published white paper detailing a historical event in which some mitek devices were implicated.It cannot be confirmed that this issue had been previously reported to mitek, so an adverse event report is being filed to document the experience described in the article.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, this file will remain receptive to any potential forthcoming information received that is pertinent and germane to this issue.Mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITEK ACL IMPLANTS
Type of Device
ACL IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
siri belur
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key3773768
MDR Text Key4359706
Report Number1221934-2014-00161
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/31/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/25/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK INTRAFIX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received01/31/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
-
-