• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC ATS MEDICAL OPEN PIVOT AP360 HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC ATS MEDICAL OPEN PIVOT AP360 HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 500DM27
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problem Thrombosis (2100)
Event Date 01/04/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Subsequently, medtronic received additional details regarding this patient¿s age ((b)(6)), gender (female), and post-implant time to the identification of the valve obstruction (approximately 41.5 months).A follow-up report will be filed when the investigation is complete or if additional information is received.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that five patients who had received replacement mechanical heart valves later underwent reoperation due to obstruction of the prosthetic valves.The information was contained in a literature article that evaluated the diagnostic use of electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row computed tomography (mdct) as a complement to echocardiography and cineradiography diagnosis for prosthetic valve dysfunction (pvd) of mechanical heart valves.It was reported that an mdct evaluation was performed on a subset of 24 patients from 270 patients who received a replacement mechanical heart valve over an eight-year period between 1997 and 2005 at a single hospital, and were followed on an annual basis with routine transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) and cineradiography on an outpatient basis.The tee and cineradiography results of the 24 patients showed normal valve function in 17 patients and prosthetic valve dysfunction (pvd) in seven.The findings of pvd included aortic prosthetic valve obstruction in four patients, an aortic annular aneurysm with paraprosthetic regurgitation in one, and a blocked leaflet in the mitral position in two.A total of 30 valves, including 23 aortic valves, 6 mitral valves, and one tricuspid valve, were subsequently evaluated via mdct.Those evaluations revealed a sub-prosthetic mass (extending from structures adjacent to the valve into the valve orifice) in all five patients with pvd (and in four patients with normal valve function in the aortic position), and one instance of an annular aneurysm.The mdct results also showed two patients with valvular masses and mitral pvd.Thrombolytic therapy for the sub-prosthetic mass was attempted in three of the five patients, but no response to the therapy was observed.Of the seven patients with atrial or mitral pvd, five underwent reoperation after the mdct evaluation (two patients declined reoperation).At reoperation, sub-prosthetic pannus in the aortic position was observed in two patients, sub-prosthetic pannus and an annular aneurysm with paraprosthetic leaks were observed in one patient, and mitral valve thrombosis was observed in two patients, confirming the findings observed on mdct.The annular aneurysm was observed in a patient who had healed infective endocarditis.The article did not report any subsequent adverse patient effects for the patients who underwent reoperation or the patients who declined.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report includes the available device and patient demographic information on the patients with mitral mechanical prosthetic valves.A separate report has been filed that includes the available device and patient demographic information on the patients with aortic mechanical prosthetic valves.Without the serial number of the products, device history records could not be pulled and reviewed.Additional information has been requested from the article¿s author contact.A supplemental report will be filed if additional information is received.Evaluation of advancing the standard valve dysfunction by multidetector-row ct teshima hideki, s.Aoyagi, t.Ueda, k.Takagi, t.Shojima, h.Tanaka j artif organs 2014 doi 10.1007/s10047-013-0751-z.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The complaint information was reported from a journal article that involved seven patients with prosthetic valve dysfunction (pvd).The available information does not indicate which issues each of these devices specifically experienced.No devices have been returned for analysis.Based on the available information, a root cause could not be determined.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPEN PIVOT AP360 HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC ATS MEDICAL
3905 annapolis lane north
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key3781160
MDR Text Key16283257
Report Number2134151-2014-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,foreign,health profe
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/27/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/30/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number500DM27
Device Catalogue Number500DM27
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/27/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00073 YR
-
-