• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number PELORIS 11
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/13/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Leica biosystems received a complaint regarding sub-optimal processing of biopsy samples from a two hour protocol.The complainant described the affected tissue samples as "mushy".And advised that the samples had been re-processed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation of this complaint by leica biosystems is in progress.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESSOR
Type of Device
TISSUE PROCESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE
495 blackburn rd.
mount waverley, victoria 3149
AS  3149
Manufacturer Contact
495 blackburn rd.
mount waverley, victoria 3149
92117400
MDR Report Key3784370
MDR Text Key4360457
Report Number8020030-2014-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IEO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/16/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/14/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberPELORIS 11
Device Catalogue Number26.0008
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/16/2013
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-