• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Connection Problem (2900)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/14/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient¿s implantable neurostimulators (ins) were being replaced with two rechargeable ins¿s due to the requirements for her high settings; she was running around 6 volts.The impedances were fine preoperatively, but after replacement at 3 volts all of the impedances were greater than 40,000 ohms with the exception of combination case and zero.The doctor was having issues inserting the extension with both ins¿s.The doctor reinserted the extensions into the old ins¿s without issues.The doctor felt much more resistance with the new ins¿s insertion and getting the extension seated may have been the issue.Later that day it was reported that the doctor had difficulty inserting the lead into the extension.All connections on the right ins had high, out of range impedances.The reporter stated that she saw ¿funky¿ impedances intra-operatively.The reporter stated that some of these bad impedances were known and pre-dated the ins replacement.The reporter also stated that every time the extension was inserted into the ins, the doctor felt a lot of resistance and could not seat it all the way.The doctor tried seven times on the first side and still had one open circuit.The doctor ended up using the bottom port because the top port was all greater than 40,000 ohms.The doctor recommended that the extension had a marker on it to ensure that the extension was properly inserted.Further in the day it was reported that the left ins had impedances greater than 40,000 ohms with electrode 11.The right ins had impedances between 10,000 and 20,000 ohms on all electrodes.The doctor noted that impedances and insertion were both fine when going back to the old ins¿s.The doctor encountered the same issues after trying the new ins¿s again.At the time of the report the patient was alive with no injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 37612, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type implantable neurostimulator.Product id: 3391s-40, lot# v597842, implanted: (b)(6)2012, product type: lead.Product id: 37085-60, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, product type: extension.Product id: 3391s-40, lot# v597842, implanted: (b)(6) 2012, product type: lead.Product id: 37085-60, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2012, product type: extension.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Upon additional review, it was determined that there was no difficulty reported regarding inserting the lead into the extension.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported the connector block with no extension/lead in reflected >40,000 on all.There was an open on electrode 11 on the left lead.It was noted with the right impedances, it was suspected that the extension may have pulled completely free from the ins.If that was the case, then the impedances in the 12k to 23k range on all electrodes were due to fluid having filled the ins connector bore.
 
Event Description
It was further reported there were some impedance issues.The impedance measurements showed: left ins c/8 666 c/9 2996 c/10 18,742 c/11 >40,000 8/9 2545 8/10 18, 975 9/10 16905 9/11 >40.00 10/11 >40,000 rt ins c/0 18,459 c/1 12,667 c/2 17,802 c/3 14, 942 0/1 18,813 0/2 23,252 0/3 20.924 1/2 15,841 1/3 13,892 2/3 15, 841 it was stated the last right ins impedances were done post rechargeable battery implant and were normal at that time.All of the contacts on the right were high and a change from the implant.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key3793873
MDR Text Key4386036
Report Number3004209178-2014-08596
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MFR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H050003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/14/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/06/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2014
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/14/2014
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age00034 YR
-
-