• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MITEK FMS USA IRRIGATION TUBE SET; FMS TUBING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MITEK FMS USA IRRIGATION TUBE SET; FMS TUBING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 284504
Device Problem Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204)
Patient Problem Surgical procedure, delayed (2565)
Event Date 04/17/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The sales rep reported the during a hip surgery that two fill chambers of the customer's irrigation tubing sets filled up right away when the tube sets were being setup.The sales rep reported that the luer lock was securely fastened and that the customer has experience with these products.The 3rd set of tubing was cut where the tubing goes around the inflow wheel and when attached began to spray everywhere including the sterile field, which needed to be redone.The sales rep reported the surgeon completed the procedure with a fourth set of tubing with a different lot number.There were no patient consequences but that the procedure was delayed over an hour.The customer discarded the 1st two sets of tubing but is returning the third for evaluation.Additional information: the sales rep was contacted on (b)(6) 2014 to confirm if the patient was under anesthesia at the time of the event and he confirmed that yes the patient was under anesthesia from the very beginning when the 1st tube set failed.This increased the time the patient was under for over an hour.See associated medwatch #'s 1221934-2014-00177 and 1221934-2014-00179.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy mitek however it is not known if it will be received within the 30 day reporting requirement, therefore, depuy mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint tubing is not being returned and therefore is not available for a physical evaluation.However, a few unused samples of this tube set from different lots were tested to replicate this failure and a potential manufacturing error was identified.Supplier identified tool wear on 3 out of 8 molds which created flash leading to increased torque needed to close the luer lock.If the luer lock is not completely tightened, an air leak occurs causing the fill chamber to overfill.The tooling was fixed by the supplier under a capa.A pra was conducted and determined the patient risk to be low.A batch record review has been conducted and the results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident as related the reported problem, and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed 2 dissimilar complaints for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.This failure has been mitigated successfully through the capa and no new complaints have been reported for the fill chamber issues.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
The sales rep reported the during a hip surgery that two fill chambers of the customer's irrigation tubing sets filled up right away when the tube sets were being setup.The sales rep reported that the luer lock was securely fastened and that the customer has experience with these products.The 3rd set of tubing was cut where the tubing goes around the inflow wheel and when attached began to spray everywhere including the sterile field, which needed to be redone.The sales rep reported the surgeon completed the procedure with a fourth set of tubing with a different lot number.There were no patient consequences but that the procedure was delayed over an hour.The customer discarded the 1st two sets of tubing but is returning the third for evaluation.Additional information: the sales rep was contacted on (b)(6) 2014 to confirm if the patient was under anesthesia at the time of the event and he confirmed that yes the patient was under anesthesia from the very beginning when the 1st tube set failed.This increased the time the patient was under for over an hour.See associated medwatch #'s 1221934-2014-00177 and 1221934-2014-00179.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITEK FMS USA IRRIGATION TUBE SET
Type of Device
FMS TUBING
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
david primmerman
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key3808606
MDR Text Key16452579
Report Number1221934-2014-00178
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K951843
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/13/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number284504
Device Lot NumberD401618
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/17/2014
Device Age2 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer04/17/2014
Date Manufacturer Received04/17/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/10/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-