• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 302; LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 302; LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/26/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The software flashcard was provided to the manufacturer for further review.Review of the decoder data showed normal lead impedance through (b)(4) 2013.The last 25% change in the impedance value was on (b)(4) 2014.High impedance was observed during an office visit on (b)(6) 2014.During the office visit, the patient¿s device settings were adjusted.X-rays dated (b)(6) 2014 were provided to the manufacturer for further review.The generator appears in the left chest in a normal placement.The filter feed-through wires appear to be intact.Due to the orientation of the images provided, lead pin insertion cannot be assessed.The electrodes appeared to be placed in normal arrangement.Part of the lead was behind the generator and could not be assessed.No clear lead breaks or sharp angles were found in the parts of the lead that could be assessed.Based on the images provided, the cause of the high lead impedance remains unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device.X-rays reviewed by manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized.Additional information indicates that the date of event is (b)(6) 2014.
 
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.It was reported that the patient recently experienced an electric shock injury which is believed to have caused the high impedance.It was reported that the patient would be referred for x-rays.The device was not programmed off after observing the high impedance.No additional relevant information has been received to date.No surgical intervention has been performed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to lead discontinuity.The explanting facility will not return explanted devices to the manufacturer for analysis; therefore, no analysis can be performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3816386
MDR Text Key4677301
Report Number1644487-2014-01307
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/22/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/16/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/31/2014
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number2689
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received08/13/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/24/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age49 YR
-
-