Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 01/26/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The software flashcard was provided to the manufacturer for further review.Review of the decoder data showed normal lead impedance through (b)(4) 2013.The last 25% change in the impedance value was on (b)(4) 2014.High impedance was observed during an office visit on (b)(6) 2014.During the office visit, the patient¿s device settings were adjusted.X-rays dated (b)(6) 2014 were provided to the manufacturer for further review.The generator appears in the left chest in a normal placement.The filter feed-through wires appear to be intact.Due to the orientation of the images provided, lead pin insertion cannot be assessed.The electrodes appeared to be placed in normal arrangement.Part of the lead was behind the generator and could not be assessed.No clear lead breaks or sharp angles were found in the parts of the lead that could be assessed.Based on the images provided, the cause of the high lead impedance remains unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device.X-rays reviewed by manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized.Additional information indicates that the date of event is (b)(6) 2014.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.It was reported that the patient recently experienced an electric shock injury which is believed to have caused the high impedance.It was reported that the patient would be referred for x-rays.The device was not programmed off after observing the high impedance.No additional relevant information has been received to date.No surgical intervention has been performed to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to lead discontinuity.The explanting facility will not return explanted devices to the manufacturer for analysis; therefore, no analysis can be performed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|