• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37603
Device Problem Electromagnetic Interference (1194)
Patient Problems Edema (1820); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Seroma (2069); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Shaking/Tremors (2515)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient presented in the last two weeks with enormous edema around one of his two leads.The patient also had some hemorrhage around the contact zone.The working diagnosis was an indolent infection, but the neuro radiologist felt the case looked more like a reaction to the lead, possibly ¿thermal¿ injury.The physician thought the lead may have possibly contributed to the infection.The lead was explanted and would be replaced in the future.Three days later it was reported that the patient was in the hospital because the infection was thought to be a concern.The infection was thought to be down the length of the lead and it was being cultured.The patient reported that last week he went through a metal detector at a courthouse with his system on and since then had been having trouble with his right side system.The patient¿s left arm was shaking badly.The implantable neurostimulator (ins) was not interrogated after the patient went through the metal detector because the lead was removed before they were aware of the issue.It was noted that no shock was mentioned when going through the system.The patient was told by the courthouse employee that the system was totally fine for him to go through after a bypass was requested because it was a ¿new¿ system.The issues occurred on (b)(6) 2014 and the patient went to the hospital the day after.The reporter noted that the therapy had been a huge improvement for the patient.Two days later it was reported that the doctor was concerned a new type of metal detector could possibly create adverse events with patients.The doctor was not sure if the patient¿s problems were caused by the metal detector, but wanted to consider all possible explanations.The patient reported feeling ¿different¿ a couple of days after (b)(6) 2014.A scan showed unilateral edema and fluid accumulation around the lead.The lead culture came back negative for an infection.The doctor was thus seeking alternate explanations and a ¿neuroradiologist¿ told him that it may be a thermal lesion.The doctor speculated and wondered if passing through a security metal detector could cause lesions.The patient was doing very well after explant.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the reporter spoke to the patient the day prior to the report and he seemed to be clear and cognizant and spoke normally.There was no further information about the cause of the patient¿s issues.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products: product id 3389s-40, lot # va0e6gu, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type lead; product id 37642, serial # (b)(4), product type programmer, patient; product id 3389s-40, lot # va0e6gd, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type lead; product id 3708660, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type extension; product id 37603, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type implantable neurostimulator; product id 3708660, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type extension.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the patient had a mri and brain culture "on thursday or friday." the patient was to be seen in office the day after the report and his therapy status would be verified as well.Later that day it was reported that one of the patient's "systems got fried going thru a metal detector." the reporter stated that the physician cultured the tissue, no infection was found, but noted the cause of the infection was the metal detector.It was unclear if there was an infection or not.At the time of the report it was unknown what the site looked like as the patient had not been heard from.The patient had not been seen or re-implanted either.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key3835878
MDR Text Key4413316
Report Number3004209178-2014-09714
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P960009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/16/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/28/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/14/2015
Device Model Number37603
Device Catalogue Number37603
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/01/2014
Date Device Manufactured11/16/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-