• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION TOSHIBA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION TOSHIBA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COIL Back to Search Results
Model Number MJAB-137A
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Swelling (2091); Burn, Thermal (2530)
Event Date 05/14/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A patient allegedly suffered a skin burn/blister approximately the size of a dime and a nickel during an mri exam.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer has investigated this issue and has determined the cause was the placement of the coil cable.It was found that the coil cable, patient's body and arm became an rf loop with capacitance.Rf current flowed thru the capacitive loop between the coil cable and the patient's arm.Foam pads should be used instead of the towel that was used between the coil and the patient's arm.Data for the coil and the rf transmission were reviewed by the manufacturer after the problem occurred and was found to be normal.The manual for the coil contains the following caution statements: route the cable that connects the anterior and posterior units of the coil properly so that it does not come into contact with the patient.If contact is unavoidable, foam pads with a compressed thickness of 1 cm should be placed between the cable and the patient.Direct contact can result in burns.If the patient's arm or shoulder or the anterior unt of the qd torso speeder comes into direct contact with the qd whole body coil (inner wall of the magnet assembly), foam pads with a compressed thickness of 1 cm should be placed between the qd whole-body coil and the patient or the anterior unit.Direct contact can result in burns.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During an mri exam, a patient allegedly complained that the coil cable was getting hot.Prior to the start of the exam, the technologist wrapped the coil cable in a towel so that it would not be in direct contact with the patient.The technologist allegedly stated that she put a second towel between the patient and the coil cable and the heat lessened.Once the exam was completed, the technologist looked at the patient's arm and found that he had a red mark on his forearm where the cable had been resting.When the patient arrived home, he said that a blister had formed.The next day the patient said that the blister had popped and that he would notify them of any change.The coil is being returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No results since evaluation has not begun.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TOSHIBA
Type of Device
MAGNETIC RESONANCE COIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
1385 shimoishigami
otawara-shi, tochigi 324- 8550
JA  324-8550
Manufacturer (Section G)
TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
1385 shimoishigami
otawara-shi, tochigi 324- 8550
JA   324-8550
Manufacturer Contact
paul biggins
2441 michelle drive
tustin, CA 92780
7147305000
MDR Report Key3867460
MDR Text Key4460751
Report Number2020563-2014-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MOS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/15/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/11/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Medical Technologist
Device Model NumberMJAB-137A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/15/2014
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient Weight104
-
-