Caller alleged discrepant low inratio2 inr result in comparison to the laboratory inr result.On (b)(6) 2014, a (b)(6) male presented to his primary care physician's office for an evaluation for liver biopsy related to elevated liver function tests and a colonoscopy related to a new onset of rectal bleeding.The laboratory inr was performed in addition to normal blood work for checkup.Laboratory results at 14:35 are as follows: inr=14.2 and prothrombin time (pt)=161.9.The patient's therapeutic range was 2.0 - 3.0.Approximately 15:10, the inratio2 inr was performed at an anticoagulation "coumadin" clinic.The result was 2.3.Reportedly, the monitor was not in the correct mode when the finger stick was performed and the sample was not immediately applied to the sample well.In addition, a capillary tube was used to obtain sample.The patient was hospitalized after receiving the laboratory inr result.In the hospital, the laboratory results were as follows: (17:45) inr=15.9; pt=180.2 (19:45) inr=12.1; pt=137.2; partial thromboplastin time (ptt)=75; hemoglobin (hgb)=16.7; hematocrit (hct)=46.4.Urinalysis, performed on (b)(6) 2014, showed the urine to be red in color with a large amount of occult blood.The patient's coumadin was held and vitamin k 10mg was administered intravenously (iv).On (b)(6) 2014 at 06:38, laboratory results as follow: inr=2.0; pt=21.7; hgb=15.3 and hct=43.4 consultation notes, dated (b)(6) 2014, indicated that the patient was to have a colonoscopy performed prior to discharge on (b)(6) 2014 and liver biopsy to be performed on an outpatient basis.On (b)(6) 2014 at 07:39, laboratory results as follows: inr=1.3; pt=13.4; hgb=15.4; and hct=43.6.There was no additional information provided.
|