|
Model Number PM100 |
Device Problem
Vibration (1674)
|
Patient Problem
Nerve Damage (1979)
|
Event Date 10/21/2010 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Lawsuit alleges: ¿¿on (b)(6) 2010 (surgeon) performed a l3-l5 decompressive laminectomy on (patient) utilizing a high speed-pneumatic drill.During the procedure (patient) suffered a dural tear, caused by the drill contacting the dura.(patient's) medical records demonstrate neither (surgeon) identified, separated or removed any scar tissue around the dura resulting from (patient) previous laminectomy¿also that there was not any type of hard instrument placed between the drill and the dura to prevent (patient) injury.¿the standard of care when using a high speed pneumatic drill was not meet as the dura was not properly identified.(patient) has incurred general damages in form of past and present physical and emotional pain and suffering and will incur additional general damages in the form of future physical and emotional pain and suffering¿¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Notice of a lawsuit was received alleging a dural tear occurred during use of a high-speed pneumatic.Because the serial number of the device could not be identified, no evaluation or review of device history records could be performed.Motor type was inferred through review of shipment records, but was unable to be confirmed.There was no allegation of malfunction of the drill.The user manual contains the following statement under general operating guidelines: ¿the legend system is designed for use by medical professionals familiar with powered surgical instrumentation.¿ (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|