• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEICA BIOSYSTEMS NUSSLOCH GMBH LEICA ASP6025; TISSUE PROCESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEICA BIOSYSTEMS NUSSLOCH GMBH LEICA ASP6025; TISSUE PROCESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number ASP6025
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 05/05/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation of the incident is currently underway and a follow up will be submitted should additional information become available following the investigation.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that after processing the tissue samples had been sub-optimally processed.As a result, some specimens could not be diagnosed.A rebiopsy of two patients was necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEICA ASP6025
Type of Device
TISSUE PROCESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEICA BIOSYSTEMS NUSSLOCH GMBH
heidelberger str. 17-19
nussloch 6922 6
GM  69226
Manufacturer Contact
robert gropp
heidelberger str. 17-19
nussloch 69226
GM   69226
MDR Report Key3885781
MDR Text Key15952771
Report Number8010478-2014-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IEO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/07/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/06/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberASP6025
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/07/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2014
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-