• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. SROM NRHFEM W/PIN MED RT 71X66; KNEE OTHER IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. SROM NRHFEM W/PIN MED RT 71X66; KNEE OTHER IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 623401R
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/30/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is still under investigation.Depuy will notify the fda of the results of this investigation once it has been completed.
 
Event Description
Implantation of s-rom noiles knee in 2007.Instability since (b)(6) 2014.Revision (b)(6) 2014.During revision pin breakage at femur became obvious.Explantation of complete construct.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is still under investigation.Depuy will notify the fda of the results of this investigation once it has been completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Examination of the submitted (b)(4) w/pin med rt 71x66 confirmed the reported fracture.The stem of the femoral component was fractured as a result of low stress high cycle fatigue crack initiation and propagation.No material defects were observed that could have contributed to fracture initiation and/or propagation to failure.There was no evidence of bone ingrowth into the porous coating of the implant and it fractured as a result of low stress high cycle fatigue crack initiation and propagation.It is not known to what extent the patient¿s history of peripheral vascular disease, obesity and smoking contributed to the complaint ¿ these could inhibit bone growth and the lack of fixation could result in the implant fatigue and fracture.No evidence was found suggesting product error was a contributing factor and the need for corrective action was not indicated.Depuy considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Review of medical records confirm reason for revision as - fracturing of the central axis of the s-rom femoral prosthesis in the patient's right knee with loosening of the femoral condyle and the tibial prosthesis - (b)(4) 2014.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SROM NRHFEM W/PIN MED RT 71X66
Type of Device
KNEE OTHER IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
steve dowell
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw, IN 46581
5743714918
MDR Report Key3887041
MDR Text Key12028786
Report Number1818910-2014-21641
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK896048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue Number623401R
Device Lot Number456401RB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/27/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/19/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/08/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient Weight115
-
-