• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Break (1069); Circuit Failure (1089); Fracture (1260); Leak/Splash (1354); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Naturally Worn (2988)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/01/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2012.It was reported that the last known normal diagnostic results occurred during an office visit on (b)(6) 2012.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history.Age at time of event, corrected data: the initial manufacturer report inadvertently did not update the patient's age at the time of the event as the lead fracture occurred prior to replacement surgery.Date of event, corrected data: the initial manufacturer report inadvertently did not update the date of event as the lead fracture occurred prior to replacement surgery.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to battery depletion, the surgeon cut the vns patient¿s lead so the lead was also replaced during the procedure.The explanted generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Analysis of the returned lead portion determined that the patient's lead was fractured prior to replacement.During the visual analysis of the returned lead portion, the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 110mm from the end of the connector boot.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having evidence of being worn to the point of fracture with flat spots on the coil surface and no pitting.During the visual analysis the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 129mm from the end of the connector boot.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having evidence of being worn to the point of fracture with flat spots on the coil surface.Pitting was observed on two of the broken coil strands and on the coil surface.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity.The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes.With the exception of the observed discontinuities the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.Note that since a portion of the lead assembly including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.The end of service for the returned generator was determined to be the result of normal battery depletion.The depletion was an expected event as determined by blc and battery voltage measurement.The module performed according to functional specifications.There was no condition noted during the product analysis evaluation that would suggest any anomaly with the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to death or serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3923737
MDR Text Key4623912
Report Number1644487-2014-01741
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/09/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/28/2010
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number200419
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/19/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/25/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/12/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age9 YR
-
-