• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Battery Problem (2885)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/01/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2014 to explant his generator and lead.The patient¿s device was explanted because the patient became seizure-free after having resective brain surgery.The explanted generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer for analysis.During visual analysis of the returned lead portion, abraded openings were found on the outer and inner silicone tubes which most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes.With the exception of the abraded tubing openings, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified.Note that since the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Analysis of the returned generator found that the elective replacement indicator was set to ¿yes¿.An open can measurement of the battery voltage confirmed that the eri flag had been properly set; the battery was partially depleted.Based on the bench analysis and the electrical test results, the device exhibited current consumption rates that were within specification; thereby, demonstrating normal battery depletion.With the exception of the eri parameter (eri flag was set to ¿yes¿ due to a low battery condition), the device performed according to functional specifications.Therefore, the electrical performance of the generator, as measured in the pa lab, will be used to conclude that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.The patient¿s physician will not provide any additional information as the patient is now seizure free.Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed that the patient¿s device was disabled on (b)(6) 2007.At the patient¿s next office visit on (b)(6) 2013, the patient¿s device was still disabled.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records and available programming and diagnostic history were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3923831
MDR Text Key21171134
Report Number1644487-2014-01745
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/09/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2004
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number5213
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/19/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/10/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/07/2002
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age29 YR
-
-