The doctor reported that the product had set up too quickly while seating six (6) crowns for the patient and the crowns for tooth #7 and #9 could not be fully seated.The doctor adjusted the occlusal surfaces and the patient left the office.The patient had returned on (b)(6) 2014 for removal of the crowns for tooth #7 and #9.A new impression was made and the patient is scheduled to return on (b)(6) 2014 for cementation of the new crowns.To date, the patient is doing fine.Kerr corporation has requested that the office report any new information with regard to this patient.An update will be provided if any new information becomes available.The product involved in the alleged incident was returned in a condition which made analysis impossible; therefore, a physical evaluation was performed on a retained sample, yielding results within specifications.In addition, no similar complaints have been received with regard to this lot.
|