• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION, INC AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION, INC AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Frayed (1262); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 05/15/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported that the autopulse platform had a broken head restraint holder and that the other side is frayed.No patient involvement was reported.The autopulse platform was subsequently returned to zoll for investigation.During investigation, the autopulse platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 27 (encoder fault (>3000 rpm)) message.Although the customer did not report this, ua 27 is considered a reportable malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform in complaint was returned to zoll on (b)(4) 2014 for investigation.Investigation results as follows: visual inspection was performed and the following damages were observed: the head restraint wire was cut/broken, thus confirming the reported complaint.The battery lock, front enclosure and bottom enclosure were also damaged.Based on the condition of the returned unit, the damages appear to have been due to wear and tear.During functional testing, a user advisory (ua) 27 (encoder fault, > 3000 rpm) was displayed.A defective integrated encoder gearbox was found to be the cause of the ua 27.No other issues were noted during functional testing.A review of the archive was performed and the ua 27 occurring during functional testing was also observed to have occurred on (b)(6) 2014.No other user advisory faults were observed on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2014.Based on the investigation, the parts identified for replacement were the top cover, battery lock, front enclosure, bottom enclosure and integrated encoder gearbox.In summary, the reported complaint of the damaged head restraint was confirmed during visual inspection and was found to be due to normal wear and tear.Functional testing resulted in a ua 27 fault which was also observed in the data archive on (b)(6) 2014.Based on the archive, no other ua faults occurred on the reported event date.Following service, including replacement of the damaged parts and defective integrated encoder gearbox, the device passed all testing criteria.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION, INC
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION, INC
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key3929832
MDR Text Key16085904
Report Number3003793491-2014-00337
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/08/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/11/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Service and Testing Personnel
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/13/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/10/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/29/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-