• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Q-MED AB SOLESTA; AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

Q-MED AB SOLESTA; AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Abscess (1690); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(6) year old female reported that she received solesta (dextranomer/hyaluronic acid) injection into the submucosa of the anal canal as treatment for fecal incontinence following a birthing tear seven years ago.Add'l medical history included solesta treatment in (b)(6) 2013 with no problems.Concurrent medications were not provided.On (b)(6) 2014, the pt received four injections of solesta.Following injections, the pt experienced mild bleeding described as "bright red spotting".Especially when she had a bowel movement.On (b)(6) 2014, the pt experienced pain in the injections area with the pain/soreness increasing on (b)(6) 2014.From the evening of(b)(6) 2014.From the evening of (b)(6) 2014 to early morning (b)(6) 2014, the pt was unable to sleep due to the pain.She took four ibuprofen tablets, 200 mg each, with only mild relief.The pt had contacted the on-call physician and was told to alternate ibuprofen and acetaminophen to control the pain.No relief from this measure resulted.At the time of this report, the pt was considering going to the emergency room.Outcome for the events was unk.A separate report was received from a nurse via a sales rep.In speaking with the nurse, the pt contacted the on-call physician on (b)(6) 2014 who then contacted the pt's treating physician.On (b)(6) 2014, the pt was admitted to the emergency room where a "sizeable" perirectal abscess was drained.This was performed as an outpatient procedure and the pt was subsequently discharged.The pt had a follow up visit scheduled for (b)(6) 2014 and the events were considered resolving at the time of this report.The nurse felt the events were serious as they required surgical intervention.She did not feel the events were related to solesta because the physician had told her that there were 4 perfect wheals at the time of solesta injection.Additionally, she felt the cause of the abscess might have been due to the pt's very serious abnormal structures as a result of her past history of birthing trauma.The pt had undergone a few surgical repairs in the past.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The report concerns a pt who received solesta and developed a perirectal abcess which was drained in the hosp as an outpatient procedure.The case had been assessed as unrelated by reporting nurse.As mfr we consider the injection procedure per se as a potential contributing factor and can therefore not totally exclude a possible causality.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SOLESTA
Type of Device
AGENT, BULKING, INJECTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
Q-MED AB
uppsala
SW 
Manufacturer (Section G)
SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
8510 colonnade center dr
raleigh NC 27615
Manufacturer Contact
seminarigetan 21
uppsala SE-75-2 28
MDR Report Key3931551
MDR Text Key19968164
Report Number3009325614-2014-00034
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/23/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/23/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/24/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
-
-