The reason for this revision surgery was identified as cup mal-positioned and liner shattered after 12.3 years of patient use.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records showed no non-conforming material reports associated with this product.A review of the product complaint report history showed there are (b)(4) prior complaints on part number 498-32-052.Of these (b)(4) complaints, (b)(4) complaints were for infection and pain, (b)(4) complaints for device cracked/broke and rest of the complaints were for poor joint.A root cause for this event could be attributed to such factors as trauma, excessive weight bearing activities, edge loading, excessive physical activity, and insufficient joint tension leading to increased impact loading or mal-position of cup which could expose the bone screw head and lead to impingement with the liner causing liner to shatter.There is no information reported that showed a material, design, or manufacturing problem with the product.
|