It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During revision the bhr cup was removed and the bhr head remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.The available medical documents were reviewed.An x-ray showed the acetabulum appeared to be about 70 to 80 degrees vertical, with evidence for ingrowth.It should be noted bhr is contraindicated in patients who are immunosuppressed or persons receiving high doses of corticosteroids.It cannot be determined to what extent the patient¿s comorbidities, chronic pain and heavy narcotic use had on his pain and clinical status.The surgeons indication for revision was malposition of the acetabular components.The vertical position of the acetabulum cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to the pain and clinical status of the patient and it cannot be concluded that the reported events are associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Based on the available information a potential root cause of improper loading has been selected due to the implant movement / migration.If the product or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|