Reportable based on device analysis completed on (b)(4) 2014.It was reported that there was difficulty deploying the filter.The stenosed target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 190cm filterwire ez¿ was used to treat the target lesion.During procedure, when the lesion was reached, it was noted that the filter basket would not open.Procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported and the patient's status was stable.However, device analysis revealed a broken distal tip.
|
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.Device evaluated by mfr.: the protection wire and the delivery sheath were returned inside a plastic bag, then inside a filterwire box.All were packed inside a plastic bag.The retrieval sheath was not returned.The peel away introducer and torquer were also returned.During the visual and microscopic examination of the returned device, the radiopaque distal tip of the protection wire was found wavy, stretched, and a approx.2.4 cm of the distal tip was found broken off.The break was not at a joint.The filter bag was found deployed, and observed to be in good condition and met specification.Blood was found on the inside of the delivery sheath.The protection wire was found exposed out or popped out of the slit in the delivery sheath from 7 cm to 11 cm, when measured from the distal end of the delivery sheath.The peel away introducer sheath was found attached to the sheath approximately at 102 cm, when measured from the distal end of the delivery sheath.The wire torquer was found attached to the protection wire at 141 cm, when measured from the distal tip of the protection wire.Protection wire was feed into the delivery sheath, and was able to perform the sheathing and unsheathing test successfully.The filter bag was successfully retracted and then deployed.The peel away test was also performed successfully, no anomalies were observed.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
|