• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KANEKA CORP. LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KANEKA CORP. LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LF-R090
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Excessive Tear Production (2235); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 06/11/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This device (lacrifast), the lacrimal duct tube, was employed to treat epiphora due to obstructions in the lacrimal duct of the patient.We got the info about this event when we interviewed with the doctor, and the actual device involved in the event was disposed of in the clinic.According to the doctor, she tried to insert and place this device into the patient's lacrimal duct.Since the doctor felt a stronger resistance than usual during the insertion of this device, she pulled it out of the patient's lacrimal duct and found that a stainless steel ring mounted in the distal tip of this device was missing.A new lacrimal duct tube from a different mfr was placed in the lesion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The concerned device "lacrifast" is not distributed in us under this device name, but is identical to the device "lacriflow lacrimal stent" distributed in us under 510 (k) # k120886.The concerned device involved in the reported event was disposed of in the clinic and was not available for our further investigation.The lot # of the device was unk.As a possible cause of dropping off the ring during use, we speculate as follows: when the doctor tried to insert and advance this device through the lacrimal passage of the patient, excessive mechanical force was loaded in the distal tip of the device where the ring was mounted and the ring was finally dismounted to drop off out of the device.Doctor's comment: when i tried to insert this device into the patient's lacrimal duct, i felt a heavy resistance due probably to heavily occluded lesion.No health harm or aftereffect of the event was seen on the patient.No worsening of the lacrimal duct obstruction, inflammation of the lacrimal duct, or worsening of the epiphora was seen in about 3 weeks after the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LACRIFAST
Type of Device
LACRIMAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
KANEKA CORP.
osaka
JA 
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu inoue
546 fifth ave 21st floor
new york, NY 10036
8005623522
MDR Report Key4008357
MDR Text Key4778228
Report Number9614654-2014-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OKS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/11/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/11/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLF-R090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/13/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-