• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS WHITESTAR SIGNATURE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS WHITESTAR SIGNATURE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number NGP680300
Device Problems Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings (1126); Increased Pump Speed (1501); Increase in Suction (1604)
Patient Problem Eye Injury (1845)
Event Date 07/24/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A surgeon reported during a cataract extraction procedure, a patient injury occurred when the iris was drawn into the phaco tip.The surgeon indicated that it is possible he inadvertently selected the incorrect phaco submode settings.He may have chosen the quad mode settings believing it to be using the peristaltic pump during the sculpt stage which increases the vacuum from 15mmhg to 120mmhg, the surgeon suspected the increase in vacuum may have caused the iris to be drawn despite the phaco tip was within the capsular bag as well as the patient may have had a very floppy iris; however not confirmed.Additional information was received indicating during the procedure, the surgeon had requested an increase in phaco power and instead vacuum was increased pulling iris into the tip.Subsequently, the patient experienced iris damage and as a result the patient has a hole in the iris.Although not confirmed, the surgeon stated the device was incorrectly prepared for use and eye anatomy was the probable cause that contributed to the patient injury.
 
Event Description
The hospital clarified the patient has permanent damage but no damage to visibility was suggested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was not provided.The phacoemulsification machine was examined and tested at the customer location by an abbott service technician and the technician was not able to duplicate the reported event.A field service checklist was performed and the event and error logs for the unit were reviewed.The vacuum was checked and tested.The customer was provided with training awareness.The system was verified for all modes of operations and calibrations.The machine was found to meet amo specifications.All pertinent information available to amo at the time of this report has been submitted.Placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
In initial report, other was selected at the time of review of information.Additional information has been provided to include disability or permanent damage as described by the hospital for outcomes attributed to adverse event the hospital provided information in which the serious injury was permanent.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics at the time of this report has been submitted.Placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WHITESTAR SIGNATURE SYSTEM
Type of Device
SIGNATURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS
santa ana CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS INC.
510 cottonwood drive
milpitas CA 95035
Manufacturer Contact
lourdes guevara
1700 east st. andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478497
MDR Report Key4032352
MDR Text Key4806107
Report Number3006695864-2014-00388
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K060366
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/24/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/25/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNGP680300
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/23/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Disability;
-
-