As noted in the publication by hayashi et al (2014), ¿pathophysiology of flow impairment during carotid artery stenting with an embolus protection filter,¿ it was noted that a patient having balloon angioplasty for symptomatic right internal carotid artery (ica) stenosis experienced flow arrest after having a 10x40mm precise stent placed in the common carotid artery (cca).Flow was restarted after filter retrieval.Postoperatively, the patient suffered from mild left hemiparesis and the mri diffusion-weighted image showed multiple high-intensity lesions in the right cerebral hemisphere.Filter observation showed 78.4 % of the area was occupied with debris and fibrin.The occupied area was 0.463 cm2 and the fibrin precipitation was 0.185 cm2.The cause of the flow impairment was filter obstruction.All procedures were performed via the femoral approach using an 8 fr guiding catheter.A 5 fr angioguard embolic protection filter was employed to prevent distal embolism during stenting.Following predilation a 10x40mm precise stent was deployed from the internal carotid artery (ica) to the common carotid artery (cca).After stent deployment post-dilation was performed with a balloon matched to the distal reference vessel diameter in order to achieve an optimal stenting result.Following stenting and postdilation the angiogram revealed flow arrest.Then the angioguard embolic protection filter was retrieved with a capture catheter.
|
As noted in the publication by hayashi et al (2014), ¿pathophysiology of flow impairment during carotid artery stenting with an embolus protection filter,¿ it was noted that a patient having balloon angioplasty for symptomatic right internal carotid artery (ica) stenosis experienced flow arrest after having a 10x40mm precise stent placed in the common carotid artery (cca).Flow was restarted after filter retrieval.Postoperatively, the patient suffered from mild left hemiparesis and the mri diffusion-weighted image showed multiple high-intensity lesions in the right cerebral hemisphere.Filter observation showed 78.4 % of the area was occupied with debris and fibrin.The occupied area was 0.463 cm2 and the fibrin precipitation was 0.185 cm2.The cause of the flow impairment was filter obstruction.All procedures were performed via the femoral approach using an 8 fr guiding catheter.A 5 fr angioguard embolic protection filter was employed to prevent distal embolism during stenting.Following predilation a 10x40mm precise stent was deployed from the internal carotid artery (ica) to the common carotid artery (cca).After stent deployment post-dilation was performed with a balloon matched to the distal reference vessel diameter in order to achieve an optimal stenting result.Following stenting and postdilation the angiogram revealed flow arrest.Then the angioguard embolic protection filter was retrieved with a capture catheter.The sterile lot numbers of each device are unknown therefore a device history report review could not be conducted.Hemiparesis and hypoperfusion are well-known potential adverse events associated with the carotid stent implantation procedure.Hemiparesis symptoms are similar to those of stroke but do not last as long.Typically symptoms of hemiparesis often last only a few minutes, most symptoms resolve within an hour but they may last up to 24 hours.Hemiparesis occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is briefly interrupted.The hemodynamic instability that occurs both during and after carotid stent implantation is influenced by the baro-receptors, which are located at the carotid bifurcation.These baro-receptors are stimulated by the stretch of interventional balloons, sds (stent delivery system) and distal protection devices, initiating a reflex via the glossopharyngeal nerve.This results in a fall in blood pressure and bradycardia.Stent placement may promote persistent stimulation of these baro-receptors.These reactions are anticipated relatively short-term adverse events associated with the compression of the baro-receptors during balloon inflation, stent implantation and filter device manipulation.Certain factors may influence the likelihood of anticipated baro-receptor reactions such as advanced age, ventricular dysfunction and gender.There is no evidence that manufacturing issues contributed to the event.Review of the information suggests that patient, vessel and procedural factors may have contributed to the reported events.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported event and are associated manufacturer report numbers 9616099-2014-00543 and 1016427-2014-00100.
|