• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK, INC.

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK, INC. Back to Search Results
Device Problem Strut fracture (1602)
Patient Problem Foreign body, removal of (2365)
Event Date 03/20/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A pt underwent gunther tulip filter retrieval on (b)(6) 2013 at hospital 2.The physician indicated that the filter had fractured and that the retrieval failed at hospital 1 due to hook or legs embedded and an extravascular piece in the vertebral body, but was successfully removed at hospital 2.The cook rep is attempting to gather add'l info.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Although catalog number is unk, but could be either k072240 or k043509.Event eval: still under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Catalog # is unknown but the 510(k) # could be either k072240 or k043509.Investigation evaluation is based solely on event description, since no device or imaging was provided for examination.During investigations, a review of the instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), quality control (qc), specifications, and trends was conducted.Per the event description.A patient underwent gunther tulip filter retrieval on (b)(6) 2013 at hospital 2 ((b)(6)).The physician indicated that the filter had fractured and that the retrieval failed at hospital 1 due to hook or legs embedded and an extravascular piece in the vertebral body, but was successfully removed at hospital 2.It is unknown when the filter was implanted and if patient underwent any surgery during filter implant.There is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications.It is cooks' experience that fracture is secondary to perforation of ivc filter perforation of the vena cava wall is a well known risk.Several case reports in the published medical and scientific literature, describe filter perforation of the vena cava wall.Changes to the filter configuration and to the filter placement, is known to cause stress and possibly fracture to the filter wires due to e g.Respiratory movements also scientific literature describes that manipulation in the area of filter placement could also contribute to change in filter configuration.Fracture of the wire is an uncommon, but known risk in relation to filter implant.A reference is made to the instructions for use (ifu).In potential adverse events are mentioned: damage to the vena cava, pulmonary embolism, filter embolization, vena cava perforation, vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, hemorrhage, hematoma at vascular access site, infection at vascular access site, death.Based on the above, the exact root cause for the reported difficulty can not be determined with certainty.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor this device.No further action will be taken.
 
Event Description
No information has been provided regarding patient outcome.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK, INC.
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
rita harden, director
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key4036822
MDR Text Key4883819
Report Number1820334-2014-00400
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072240
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,user facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/20/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/20/2013
Device Age NA
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received08/06/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-