• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK, INC.; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK, INC.; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Device Problem Strut fracture (1602)
Patient Problem Foreign body, removal of (2365)
Event Date 01/09/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A pt underwent a gunther tulip filter retrieval on (b)(6) 2013 at hospital 2 (hup).The physician indicated the filter had fractured and that the retrieval had failed at hospital 1 because the hook or legs were embedded; but intact.The device was successfully removed intact at hospital 2.Cook rep is trying to get additional info.Info not provided by the reporter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog # is unk; however, could be either k072240 or k043509.Event is still under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation evaluation is based solely on event description, since no device or imaging have been available for examination.It is unk when the gunther tulip filter was implanted and also the pt's medical history.During the course of investigation, a review of the instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (m), quality control (qc), specifications, and trends was conducted.No evidence to suggest device failure based on information provided.It is cook's experience that fracture is secondary to perforation of ivc.Filter perforation of the vena cava wall is a well known risk.Several case reports in the published medical and scientific literature, describe filter perforation of the vena cava wall.Changes to the filter configuration and to the filter placement, is known to cause stress and possibly fracture to the filter wires due to e.G.Respiratory movements.Also scientific literature describes that manipulation in the area of filter placement could also contribute to change in filter configuration.Fracture of the wire is an uncommon, but known risk in relation to filter implant.A reference is made to the instructions for use: in potential adverse events are mentioned- damage to the vena cava, pulmonary embolism, filter embolization, vena cava perforation, vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, hemorrhage, hematoma at vascular access site, infection at vascular access site, death.Based on the limited information provided, the exact root cause for what caused the filter fracture and difficult retrieval cannot be determined.We will continue to monitor the device.Per the quality engineering risk assessment (qera), no further action is required.
 
Event Description
It is unk if the pt underwent any additional procedures or any adverse effects at this time.Information has been requested but none have been provided by the reporter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK, INC.
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
rita harden, dir
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key4054079
MDR Text Key4730760
Report Number1820334-2014-00398
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072240
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,user facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/26/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/09/2013
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received08/06/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-