On (b)(6) 2014, synergeyes received a complaint wherein the patient (pt) sustained a corneal abrasion.Report stated: abrasion occurred in the left eye (os) a half hour after pick up.Pt was instructed to discontinue use of lenses and see ecp in two days' time.At the follow up appointment, dr.Stated "bearing could have caused abrasion." on (b)(6) 2014, synergeyes attempted to contact the practice and a message was left with (b)(6) to have a contact lens dept rep return the call.On (b)(6) 2014, synergeyes received a call from (b)(4), the following info was obtained: by "bearing in the lens" the doctor meant that the lens fit too tightly.
|
During the investigation the following info was obtained: lens 1: lot: 058827, part number: ck25m-0475.Base curve was measured by radius scope and power was measured by lensometer.Both bc and power were found to be within specs.Although deposits and smudges were noted on surface, both were removed by saline and were most likely due to regular pt use.No correlation was found between the alleged injury and the device history report.Lens 2: lot: 058827, part number: ck25m-0475.Base curve was measured by radius scope and power was measured by lensometer.Both bc and power were found to be within specs.Although deposits and smudges were noted on surface, both were removed by saline and were most likely due to regular pt use.No correlation was found between the alleged injury and the device history report.
|