• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE FILTERWIRE EZ?; TEMPORARY CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT FOR EMBOLIC PROTECTION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE FILTERWIRE EZ?; TEMPORARY CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT FOR EMBOLIC PROTECTION Back to Search Results
Model Number H749201001900
Device Problems Break (1069); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/08/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that wire on the filter bag broke.The stenosed target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 190cm filterwire ez¿ was selected to treat the target lesion.During the procedure, the filterwire could not cross the lesion due to the condition of the vessel.The wire on the filter bag was broken.The physician pulled the device back and removed it outside of the patient.The procedure was not completed.No patient complications reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned or analysis.During visual and microscopic examination of the returned device, the radiopaque distal tip of the protection wire was found curved, kinked and wavy.The filter bag was found retracted into the delivery sheath with 4 mm of the nosecone exposed.No broken or detached wire was found.Product analysis only confirmed distal tip damage.Blood was found on the inside of the delivery sheath.The filter bag was successfully deployed and then retracted; the filter bag was observed to be in good condition and met specification.The peel away test was also performed successfully, no anomalies were observed.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that wire on the filter bag broke.The stenosed target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 190cm filterwire ez¿ was selected to treat the target lesion.During the procedure, the filterwire could not cross the lesion due to the condition of the vessel.The wire on the filter bag was broken.The physician pulled the device back and removed it outside of the patient.The procedure was not completed.No patient complications reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILTERWIRE EZ?
Type of Device
TEMPORARY CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT FOR EMBOLIC PROTECTION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE
150 baytech drive
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SAN JOSE
150 baytech drive
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key4060791
MDR Text Key4905825
Report Number2134265-2014-05504
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NFA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCN
PMA/PMN Number
K061332
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/11/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/04/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2015
Device Model NumberH749201001900
Device Catalogue Number20100-190
Device Lot Number16308866
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/14/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/25/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/15/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-