• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC PRESIDIO - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC PRESIDIO - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKPRESIDIO
Device Problem No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problem Edema (1820)
Event Date 10/04/2010
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Headache leading to hospitalization.Investigator indicated mild severity; possibly related to micrus coils.Patient was enrolled on (b)(6) 2010.Pre-op modified rankin score was 0.The subject received coiling treatment for a large; incidental; unruptured basal artery aneurysm on (b)(6) 2010.The irregular 22 mm x 12 mm x 6 mm (neck) aneurysm was treated with 19 cerecyte coils.The post-op angiographic grading scale was 1; no filling of neck or dome.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2010 with an mrs score of 0.On (b)(6) 2010; the patient presented to er complaining of a headache.A ct taken on same day showed cerebral edema in the area of the coiling and patient was admitted.The patient was given darvocet for the headache; no medical treatment for the cerebral edema was given.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2010.At one month follow-up on (b)(6) 2010; the mrs score was 1.No diagnostic exams were performed.The subject returned on (b)(6) 2011 for a 6 month follow up.The angiogram showed a recurrence with the angiographic grading score was 2; filling of aneurysm neck but not dome.No retreatment was performed.Cerecyte coils used: (1) presidio 18; 18 x 20; (2) presidio 18; 18 x 46; (3) presidio 18; 16 x 47; (4) presidio 18; 14 x 47; (5) presidio 18; 10 x 34; (6) presidio 18; 10 x 34; (7) presidio 18; 8 x 30; (8) presidio 18; 8 x30; (9) micrusphere 18; 7 x 14.3; (10) cashmere 14; 6 x 15; (11) cashmere 14; 6 x 15; (12) cashmere 14; 5 x 12; (13) cashmere 14; 5 x 12; (14) cashmere 14; 4 x 8; (15) cashmere 14; 4 x 8; (16) deltaplush 10; 4 x 8; (17) deltaplush 10; 3 x 6; (18) cashmere 14; 2 x 2.5; (19) cashmere 14; 2 x 2.5.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products and therapy dates: (1) presidio 18; 18 x 20; (2) presidio 18; 18 x 46; (3) presidio 18; 16 x 47; (4) presidio 18; 14 x 47; (5) presidio 18; 10 x 34; (6) presidio 18; 10 x 34; (7) presidio 18; 8 x 30; (8) presidio 18; 8 x30; (9) micrusphere 18; 7 x 14.3; (10) cashmere 14; 6 x 15; (11) cashmere 14; 6 x 15; (12) cashmere 14; 5 x 12; (13) cashmere 14; 5 x 12; (14) cashmere 14; 4 x 8; (15) cashmere 14; 4 x 8; (16) deltaplush 10; 4 x 8; (17) deltaplush 10; 3 x 6; (18) cashmere 14; 2 x 2.5; (19) cashmere 14; 2 x 2.5 - details all unknown.Conclusion: headache leading to hospitalization.Investigator indicated mild severity; possibly related to micrus coils.Patient was enrolled on (b)(6) 2010.Pre-op modified rankin score was 0.The subject received coiling treatment for a large; incidental; unruptured basal artery aneurysm on (b)(6) 2010.The irregular 22 mm x 12 mm x 6 mm (neck) aneurysm was treated with 19 cerecyte coils.The post-op angiographic grading scale was 1; no filling of neck or dome.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2010 with an mrs score of 0.On (b)(6) 2010; the patient presented to er complaining of a headache.A ct taken on same day showed cerebral edema in the area of the coiling and patient was admitted.The patient was given darvocet for the headache; no medical treatment for the cerebral edema was given.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2010.At one month follow-up on (b)(6) 2010; the mrs score was 1.No diagnostic exams were performed.The subject returned on (b)(6) 2011 for a 6 month follow up.The angiogram showed a recurrence with the angiographic grading score was 2; filling of aneurysm neck but not dome.No retreatment was performed.Cerecyte coils used: (1) presidio 18; 18 x 20; (2) presidio 18; 18 x 46; (3) presidio 18; 16 x 47; (4) presidio 18; 14 x 47; (5) presidio 18; 10 x 34; (6) presidio 18; 10 x 34; (7) presidio 18; 8 x 30; (8) presidio 18; 8 x30; (9) micrusphere 18; 7 x 14.3; (10) cashmere 14; 6 x 15; (11) cashmere 14; 6 x 15; (12) cashmere 14; 5 x 12; (13) cashmere 14; 5 x 12; (14) cashmere 14; 4 x 8; (15) cashmere 14; 4 x 8; (16) deltaplush 10; 4 x 8; (17) deltaplush 10; 3 x 6; (18) cashmere 14; 2 x 2.5; (19) cashmere 14; 2 x 2.5.The products remain implanted and were not returned for evaluation.No corrective actions will be taken at this time.This mdr is being submitted as part of a retrospective review as the result of a recent fda audit and with accordance to the requirements of code of federal regulations.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESIDIO - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC (SAN JOSE)
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
5088283106
MDR Report Key4087459
MDR Text Key17996791
Report Number1226348-2014-00633
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K062036
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/01/2011
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/13/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKPRESIDIO
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/01/2011
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
-
-