• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG TALOS DR; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG TALOS DR; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number 356248
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Premature End-of-Life Indicator (1480)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/08/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ous mdr - after an estimated implantation period of about 72 months, it was reported that the pacemaker could not be interrogated and eos was suspected.Furthermore it was reported that during a follow up on (b)(6) 2013, the device indicated a calculated remaining battery life-time of 4 years and 9 months.The device was explanted and returned to biotronik.The date of implant was not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The pacemaker was received for analysis.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this pacemaker were re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.Upon receipt the pacemaker could not be interrogated, confirming the clinical observation.Furthermore no therapy functionality was present.Therefore, the pacemaker was opened to examine the inner assembly and to check the functionality of the electronic module.A visual inspection showed no anomalies.However, the battery was found to be depleted.At a next step the electronic module was attached to an external power supply.In the course of analysis the electrical parameters, particularly the current consumption of the electronic module, were found to be normal and as expected.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia therapy functions proved to be within specification.The memory content of the device was not restorable due to the battery depletion.Hence, the programmed parameters since the last follow-up were not determinable.The battery was sent to the manufacturer for a further detailed analysis.Analysis of the battery the manufacturing records were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process, associated to this battery.During the electrical measurement, the battery depletion was confirmed.However, a visual inspection and x-ray imaging of the battery did not reveal any signs of damage.The destructive analysis of the battery yielded no anomalies.The amount of charge taken from the battery was verified.The battery condition was found to be anticipated for a depleted battery.There was no indication of a workmanship or a material problem.Summary: the battery of the pacemaker was found to be depleted.Despite a thorough and time consuming analysis no conclusion can be drawn regarding the root cause of the clinical observation, in particular the analysis of the electronic module as well as the battery did not show any anomalies.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TALOS DR
Type of Device
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-12 359
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key4088613
MDR Text Key4827467
Report Number1028232-2014-003236
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P950037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/15/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number356248
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/02/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/09/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-