The patient was reported implanted with a boston scientific uphold vaginal support system, an ams in-fast ultra, and an ams intexen (b)(6) 2011 at (b)(6).The patient was implanted with a surgisis 4x7 and a surgisis 7x10 on (b)(6) 2013 and a biodesign product on (b)(6) 2014 at (b)(6).The patient and her attorney have alleged that as a result of these products being implanted in the patient, the patient has experienced pain, injury, and has undergone medical treatment.The following information was not provided by the complainant: specific information of the alleged injury, specific information regarding whether intervention was performed, specific information regarding why intervention was performed or what type/to what extent intervention was performed, specific correlation between device performance and alleged injury, current patient status.
|