|
Catalog Number CDH29A |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590)
|
Patient Problem
Surgical procedure (2357)
|
Event Date 08/26/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a laparoscopic sigmoid procedure, the surgeon was using the cdh25a, fired the device, and was not sure if device fired staples.The surgeon then attempted to remove the device but could not remove it from the rectum.The surgeon converted to open procedure to push the stapler out, and with the stapler went a large amount of mucosa.The surgeon resected the colon and had to mobilize and ligate all the way up to the transverse colon.The surgeon then used the cdh29a to perform an anastomosis.When the anastomosis was tested, there was a leak, so the surgeon used a suture of unknown code (on an sh needle) to oversew the area.While oversewing the area, the tip of the suture needle broke off.The surgeon looked for the needle tip in the rectum and did not find it.An x-ray was done and no needle tip was visualized on x-ray.The case was completed and current patient status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).At the time of this submission, the device has not been returned for analysis.If the device is received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information requested: what is the patient¿s current condition? what confirmation did the surgeon receive that the anvil was firmly attached? were any of the forces higher or lower than expected (closing, firing, or opening)? were any unexpected noises heard? what confirmation was received indicating the device was fully fired (such as crunch, compressed until unable to fire further, etc.)? did the washer get cut into two (2) pieces? were there two complete tissue donuts? was the instrument fired across or near an existing staple line or clip? were any unformed or malformed staples observed? how long has the surgeon been using this device for this procedure? who fired the device? assistant or the surgeon?.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Information is unavailable; device was not returned for evaluation.Additional information received: what is the patient¿s current condition? patient went home.What confirmation did the surgeon receive that the anvil was firmly attached? unk.Were any of the forces higher or lower than expected (closing, firing, or opening)? unk.Were any unexpected noises heard? unk.What confirmation was received indicating the device was fully fired (such as crunch, compressed until unable to fire further, etc.)? unk.Did the washer get cut into two (2) pieces? unk.Were there two complete tissue donuts? unk.Was the instrument fired across or near an existing staple line or clip? unk.Were any unformed or malformed staples observed? unk.How long has the surgeon been using this device for this procedure? unk.Who fired the device? assistant or the surgeon? surgeon fired the stapler.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|