• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SORIN CRM OVATIO; DEFIBRILLATOR, IMPLANTABLE, DUAL-CHAMBER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SORIN CRM OVATIO; DEFIBRILLATOR, IMPLANTABLE, DUAL-CHAMBER Back to Search Results
Model Number OVATIO DR 6550
Device Problem Failure to Deliver Energy (1211)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/28/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
During a follow-up performed on (b)(6) 2014, a warning message was displayed indicating that the defibrillation system would be ineffective (due to abnormally low shock impedance).In the corresponding episode (classified as ventricular fibrillation), it was observed that capacitors were charged to 34 joules, but no shock could be delivered.The arrhythmia spontaneously ceased.It was also reported that all stored episodes were misclassified as ventricular fibrillation, whereas they correspond to supra-ventricular arrhythmias.Patient care recommendations were provided (evaluate the benefit of a re-intervention for replacing the defibrillation lead).A new follow-up was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Vf induction test was performed.Vf was successfully induced with a 0,6j shock on t-wave; but no shock therapy (34j) could be delivered to reduce the arrhythmia due to overload detection (i.E.The detection of low shock impedance).An external defibrillation shock was reportedly delivered; return to slow rhythm majority was then observed.Re-intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Icd and defibrillation lead were both replaced.The icd will be returned to sorin crm for expertise.
 
Event Description
During a follow-up performed on (b)(6) 2014, a warning message was displayed indicating that the defibrillation system would be ineffective (due to abnormally low shock impedance).In the corresponding episode (classified as ventricular fibrillation), it was observed that capacitors were charged to 34 joules, but no shock could be delivered.The arrhythmia spontaneously ceased.It was also reported that all stored episodes were misclassified as ventricular fibrillation, whereas they correspond to supra-ventricular arrhythmias.Patient care recommendations were provided (evaluate the benefit of a re-intervention for replacing the defibrillation lead).A new follow-up was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Vf induction test was performed.Vf was successfully induced with a 0,6j shock on t-wave; but no shock therapy (34j) could be delivered to reduce the arrhythmia due to overload detection (i.E.The detection of low shock impedance).An external defibrillation shock was reportedly delivered; return to slow rhythm majority was then observed.Re-intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Icd and defibrillation lead were both replaced.The icd will be returned to sorin crm for expertise.
 
Event Description
During a follow-up performed on (b)(6) 2014, a warning message was displayed indicating that the defibrillation system would be ineffective (due to abnormally low shock impedance).In the corresponding episode (classified as ventricular fibrillation), it was observed that capacitors were charged to 34 joules, but no shock could be delivered.The arrhythmia spontaneously ceased.It was also reported that all stored episodes were misclassified as ventricular fibrillation, whereas they correspond to supra-ventricular arrhythmias.Patient care recommendations were provided (evaluate the benefit of a re-intervention for replacing the defibrillation lead).A new follow-up was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Vf induction test was performed.Vf was successfully induced with a 0,6j shock on t-wave; but no shock therapy (34j) could be delivered to reduce the arrhythmia due to overload detection (i.E.The detection of low shock impedance).An external defibrillation shock was reportedly delivered; return to slow rhythm majority was then observed.Re-intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Icd and defibrillation lead were both replaced.The icd will be returned to sorin crm for expertise.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Preliminary analysis of the returned device confirmed it operated as specified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OVATIO
Type of Device
DEFIBRILLATOR, IMPLANTABLE, DUAL-CHAMBER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SORIN CRM
parc d'affaires noveos 4 avenue réaumur
.
clamart 92140
FR  92140
Manufacturer (Section G)
SORIN CRM 98, RUE MAURICE ARNOUX 92120 MONTROUGE FRANCE
parc d'affaires noveos 4 avenue réaumur
.
clamart 9214 0
FR   92140
Manufacturer Contact
elodie vincent
parc d'affaires noveos 4 avenue réaumur
.
clamart 92140
FR   92140
0146013665
MDR Report Key4100906
MDR Text Key4834088
Report Number1000165971-2014-00537
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
PP980049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/29/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/19/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date04/03/2010
Device Model NumberOVATIO DR 6550
Device Catalogue NumberOVATIO DR 6550
Device Lot NumberM090408
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date08/29/2014
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received02/27/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-