The device was manufactured in august 1002 and was in service in the field for 22 years.The customer indicated that a drifting of the arm assembly was noticed several weeks prior to the incident, along with a small crack in the assembly, which was ignored.The technician claimed that the unit was serviced periodically although there was no documented evidence found for maintenance.The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation on (b)(4) 2014.It was noticed that the horizontal arm was broken at the inner pivot housing, which caused the unit to separate from the horizontal arm to the main converter.The likely cause of the failure was the prolonged service of the unit beyond the end of the life.This concludes the investigation related to this incident.
|