• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ZIV6-35-80-6.0-120-PTX
Device Problem Restricted Flow rate (1248)
Patient Problems Occlusion (1984); Surgical procedure, additional (2564)
Event Date 07/22/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This report is being submitted in relation to a zilver ptx device with restricted bloodflow through the stent due to restenosis.Knowledge of this complaint issue arose from an image review related to another complaint under investigation (zilver flex device reported for a stent fracture).No knowledge of this complaint event prior to the receipt of the image review.Image review noted procedural angiogram images showed an occluded right sfa.A zilver ptx device (this report) and a zilver flex device (separate complaint investigation) were placed in the right sfa on the (b)(6) 2012.On (b)(6) 2014 (2 years later), the patient had returned to the angiosuite for a new intervention of the right leg after sub-acute symptoms.The secondary intervention images showed a diminished blood flow within the zilver ptx stent.The zilver ptx stent was ballooned with a wanda balloon and blood flow was restored.No further adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occuring as a result of the restricted blood flow through the zilver ptx stent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The involved zilver ptx stent (zivs-35 80-6.0-120-ptx, lot# unknown) was implanted in the patient therefore is not available for evaluation.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.Angiogram images were provided to support the complaint investigation and the following impression from the image review was provided: "native vessels stenosis is consistent with atherosclerotic plaque.Ln-stent stenosis is consistent with intimal hyperplasia although atherosclerotic plaque could be present as well.Thrombus was not present or it would have likely embolized distally upon angioplasty.Diffuse severe stenosis developed over the two years not only in the stented segments but in the popliteal and the profunda femoral arteries.The stent fractures may have contributed locally, causing occlusion rather than stenosis.However it is unlikely, given the severe disease progression in the profunda, that the occlusions were a significant factor elsewhere.If the bare metal zilver stent fractures had never occurred (separate complaint investigation for zilver flex device), the patient would still have presented with severe recurrent disease although perhaps slightly later.The most common reason for this is persistent tobacco abuse.At least moderate inflow and moderate to severe outflow limitation likely aggravated the restenosis to a minor degree.Given the persistent severe popliteal stenosis and the diffuse severe disease process, limited patency is expected." from the image review, the customer complaint can be confirmed as restricted blood flow due to restenosis was observed within the zilver ptx stent.Stenosis was developed over the two years after initial stenting procedure not only in the stented segment but also in popliteal and profunda arteries.Stent fracture of the other zilver flex stent (separate investigation) implanted could have contributed to occlusion, however according to the image review, if the zilver flex fractures had never occurred, the patient would still have presented with a severe recurrent disease.Based on the above it can be stated that it is very unlikely that restenosis could have occurred due to zilver ptx malfunction.Image review indicates that in-stent stenosis is consistent with intimal hyperplasia although atherosclerotic plaque could be present as well.Therefore, recurring disease (related to patient's condition/tobacco abuse) is the most likely cause of the occlusion which resulted in diminished blood flow.However, a definitive cause of this event cannot be determined.As per instruction for use, restenosis of the stented artery is noted as a potential adverse event associated with the placement of this device.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.The manufacturing records for the zilver ptx and zilver ptx drug eluting stent could not be reviewed as the specific lot number was not provided.The zilver ptx stent was ballooned and blood flow was restored, however according to independent reviewer, limited patency is expected due to severe popliteal stenosis and the diffuse severe disease process.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
limerick
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
tracy o'sullivan, unk
61334440
MDR Report Key4106204
MDR Text Key4714843
Report Number3001845648-2014-00170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
P100022/S001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Unknown
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/15/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/12/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberZIV6-35-80-6.0-120-PTX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/22/2014
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received08/15/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-