The involved zilver ptx stent (zivs-35 80-6.0-120-ptx, lot# unknown) was implanted in the patient therefore is not available for evaluation.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.Angiogram images were provided to support the complaint investigation and the following impression from the image review was provided: "native vessels stenosis is consistent with atherosclerotic plaque.Ln-stent stenosis is consistent with intimal hyperplasia although atherosclerotic plaque could be present as well.Thrombus was not present or it would have likely embolized distally upon angioplasty.Diffuse severe stenosis developed over the two years not only in the stented segments but in the popliteal and the profunda femoral arteries.The stent fractures may have contributed locally, causing occlusion rather than stenosis.However it is unlikely, given the severe disease progression in the profunda, that the occlusions were a significant factor elsewhere.If the bare metal zilver stent fractures had never occurred (separate complaint investigation for zilver flex device), the patient would still have presented with severe recurrent disease although perhaps slightly later.The most common reason for this is persistent tobacco abuse.At least moderate inflow and moderate to severe outflow limitation likely aggravated the restenosis to a minor degree.Given the persistent severe popliteal stenosis and the diffuse severe disease process, limited patency is expected." from the image review, the customer complaint can be confirmed as restricted blood flow due to restenosis was observed within the zilver ptx stent.Stenosis was developed over the two years after initial stenting procedure not only in the stented segment but also in popliteal and profunda arteries.Stent fracture of the other zilver flex stent (separate investigation) implanted could have contributed to occlusion, however according to the image review, if the zilver flex fractures had never occurred, the patient would still have presented with a severe recurrent disease.Based on the above it can be stated that it is very unlikely that restenosis could have occurred due to zilver ptx malfunction.Image review indicates that in-stent stenosis is consistent with intimal hyperplasia although atherosclerotic plaque could be present as well.Therefore, recurring disease (related to patient's condition/tobacco abuse) is the most likely cause of the occlusion which resulted in diminished blood flow.However, a definitive cause of this event cannot be determined.As per instruction for use, restenosis of the stented artery is noted as a potential adverse event associated with the placement of this device.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.The manufacturing records for the zilver ptx and zilver ptx drug eluting stent could not be reviewed as the specific lot number was not provided.The zilver ptx stent was ballooned and blood flow was restored, however according to independent reviewer, limited patency is expected due to severe popliteal stenosis and the diffuse severe disease process.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
|