CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM; CNV ENTERPRISE SES (NJE)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number ENC452800 |
Device Problem
Physical Resistance (2578)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 09/25/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
During vrd-assisted coil embolization of an aneurysm at the patient¿s internal carotid-posterior communicating artery, when the physician inserted the enterprise vrd (b)(4) into the prowler select plus (b)(4), he experienced a resistance at the middle of the microcatheter.Both complaint products were withdrawn from the patient, and the procedure was successfully completed without further issues or delay.However, the procedure was completed without the deployment of a vrd.There was no patient injury/complications reported.The complaint products were new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu, and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.Prior to use, no defect (kink, bends, etc.) was noted on the products by visual inspection, and no damages were reported on the other devices after the event.Furthermore, no unintended deployment of the vrd was observed in either the vessel or in the microcatheter.Since the complaint products have already been disposed, they are not available for evaluation.No further information was available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).Concomitant devices: 7fr fubuki (asahi intecc), excelsior sl-10 (stryker) enterprise (lot 10250060) (b)(4).Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Complaint conclusion: during vrd-assisted coil embolization of an aneurysm at the patient¿s internal carotid-posterior communicating artery, when the physician inserted the enterprise vrd (enc452800/10250060) into the prowler select plus (606-s255fx/16105849), he experienced a resistance at the middle of the microcatheter.Both complaint products were withdrawn from the patient, and the procedure was successfully completed without further issues or delay without the deployment of a vrd.There was no patient injury/complications reported.The complaint products were new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu, and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.Prior to use, no defect (kink, bends, etc.) was noted on the products by visual inspection, and no damages were reported on the other devices after the event.Furthermore, no unintended deployment of the vrd was observed in either the vessel or in the microcatheter.Since the complaint products have already been disposed, they are not available for evaluation.No further information was available.The device was not returned for analysis.Lake region medical reviewed the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of lot 10250060.The device history record review also included a review of the certificate of conformance received from specialty coatings systems and nitinol devices and components, along with lake region medical¿s internal receiving inspection records for the stents issued to the complaint lot.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.The resistance between the vrd and the microcatheter could not be confirmed without return of the device for analysis, and it is not possible to determine the root cause of the event.Based on the information provided and the review of manufacturing documentation, there was no evidence of a manufacturing issue related to event; therefore, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is 1 of 2 mdrs related to this complaint with associated manufacture report numbers of 1058196-2014-00257 and 1058196-2014-00258.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|