• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE Back to Search Results
Model Number BI-700-00027-120
Device Problems Application Program Problem: Dose Calculation Error (1189); Device Issue (2379); Improper Device Output (2953)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/15/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction, original report should read: product code: oxo.Common device name: image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile.
 
Event Description
A site representative, radiographic technologist (rt), reported an o-arm 1000 imaging system dose report, taken in a spine procedure the previous day, was lower than expected.No further details of the procedure were provided.There was no impact on patient outcome.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was unavailable from the site, neurocoordinator declined to provide demographics.Rma issued.Replacement control board shipped to site 09/18/2014; suspect device returned to manufacturer 10/02/2014.Rma issued.Replacement pleora shipped to site 09/18/2014; suspect device returned to manufacturer 10/02/2014.Software investigation found that the reported event was related to a software issue.This issue was documented in a medtronic navigation software anomaly tracking database.09/24/2014 a medtronic representative performed an imaging system check-out and reported replacing the control board and pleora; system functioned normally.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The control board and pleora box components of the imaging system were returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Both components ran without issue on a test system.The components were found to be fully functional with no problem found.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A capa was created to address the reported incident.Based on the capa investigation, the identified root cause for this event was that the operator changes the gui parameters between the end of scan and when dose report commanded.This is an unanticipated sequence of user action outside of the typical post-operative workflow when the dose report is uploaded for possible accumulation into the patients' lifetime dose records.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM
Type of Device
IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460 9710
Manufacturer Contact
amos jarrette
826 coal creek circle
louisville, CO 80027-9710
7208902082
MDR Report Key4174404
MDR Text Key16212086
Report Number1723170-2014-01086
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OXO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K050996
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,company represent
Reporter Occupation Radiologic Technologist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/15/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Radiologic Technologist
Device Model NumberBI-700-00027-120
Device Catalogue Number9732719
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/02/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/26/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-