• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BETTLACH IMPACTOR F/PFNA BLADE; ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT.

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BETTLACH IMPACTOR F/PFNA BLADE; ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT. Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 356.823
Device Problem Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem Sedation (2368)
Event Date 09/21/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported the surgeon introduced the impactor with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (pfna) blade on it for placement however when he tried to remove it the hardware jammed.The surgeon removed the impactor with the drill sleeve and blade attached as one piece.This event resulted in a two hour delay in surgery.Patient outcome was reported to be ¿okay¿.The problem was resolved by using a plier wrench, striking forward and back until the blade released, the surgeon was then able to place another with the instrumental extraction this is report 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The part and lot number of the returned devices do not match the information reported.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.G5 510k#: device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as the product is entering the complaint system.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: the visual inspection of the returned device performed as part of the manufacturing investigation reported the articles are blocked together.The blocked devices were removed together with the responsible product manager, the manager was able to separate the blade from the impactor.Functional testing showed that all devices are functional as required.Based on the provided complaint description the investigation was not able to determine the exact cause of this occurrence.The complaint condition is likely the result of either wrong direction of rotation of the left-hand threaded mechanism or the use of the key 356.823 caused the blocking of the devices.In this relation we would like to point out this key should be only used for the removal of the blade.The impactor 356.823 is an old version and should be replaced with the article 03.010.410 if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPACTOR F/PFNA BLADE
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT.
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH25 44
SZ  CH2544
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH25 44
SZ   CH2544
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4180970
MDR Text Key5089991
Report Number9612488-2014-10447
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/17/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number356.823
Device Lot Number2527522
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/23/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/07/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age21 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-