• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NIDEK CO., LTD. MK-2000; HANDPIECE NIDEK KERATOME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NIDEK CO., LTD. MK-2000; HANDPIECE NIDEK KERATOME Back to Search Results
Model Number MK-2000
Device Problem Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/26/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Nidek received a complaint from a customer on (b)(6) 2014.Customer reported that during the surgery on (b)(6) 2014 with mk-2000 hand piece s/n: (b)(4) a free flap occurred with 130um blade holder and 9.5mm suction ring on patient's first eye.The second eye was done with a 160um blade holder and 9.5 suction ring.The second flap was fine.There was no other information provided at the time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Nidek contacted the customer to do follow up on (b)(6) 2014; dr.(b)(6) reported that the free flap patient looked good with healed abrasion and 20/25+ va.Temporal edge of flap was slightly rough so a new bandage contact lens was put in.The patient's dose for durezol was decreased to bid.Patient was on moxeza qid and ats q2h.On (b)(4) 2014 nidek director of sales and marketing called back again to check the patient's status and talked to the nurse and confirmed that the patient did fine with 20/20 va.Nidek contacted the facility again on (b)(4) 2014 to make sure that the patient recovered well and did not develop any adverse events due to the free flap.The affected device was returned to nidek for evaluation on 03/28/2014.Nidek service engineer (se) had conducted an evaluation and tested for proper operation.Service engineer found that the height size was out of specification for blade holder s/no: (b)(4).She also checked the other two blade holders s/no: (b)(4) which were within specifications.Hand piece has been operational with blade holders s/n (b)(4) and not with s/no: (b)(4).Nidek considers this failure mode a reportable event as the device has malfunctioned and has a potential to cause or contribute to a serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MK-2000
Type of Device
HANDPIECE NIDEK KERATOME
Manufacturer (Section D)
NIDEK CO., LTD.
34-14, hiroishi
gamagori, aichi
Manufacturer (Section G)
NIDEK CO., LTD.
34-14, hiroishi
gamagori, aichi 443- 0038
JA   443-0038
Manufacturer Contact
neo yamaguchi
47651 westinghouse dr.
fremont, CA 94539
5105572550
MDR Report Key4188887
MDR Text Key5091626
Report Number3002807715-2014-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HNO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K990900
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/28/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/25/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMK-2000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/28/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2001
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-