(b)(4).Additional information: the analysis results found that the el5ml device was received with one jaw disengaged from the cam; this condition would not allow the jaws to collapse in order to form the clips.In an attempt to replicate the reported incident, the device was tested for functionality.Upon firing of the device, one clip was ejected due to the jaw condition.In order to evaluate the performance of the device, the jaw was readjusted and in the next actuations, six conforming clips were fed and formed; finally the device locked out as intended.Possible causes for the condition of the jaw disengaged from the cam may be inadvertent force, twisting or pressure being placed on the device jaws, using the jaws of the device as a dissector/retractor or damage to the jaws while entering the trocar.It is known from the history of the device that the disengagement of the jaws may have cause difficulties to insert and/or remove the instrument through the trocar.The batch record was reviewed and no anomalies were noted during the manufacturing process.
|
It was reported that during an unknown procedure, there was an issue with the device out of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy tray.It would not fit into the port, the user kept squeezing it but the jaw was out of alignment so it would not fit in the port and it would not close properly to shut the clip so we had to open a separate device.There was no patient consequence.
|