• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EZEM PROTOCOL ADMIN SET; PROTOCOL COLON INSUFFLATOR - 6400

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EZEM PROTOCOL ADMIN SET; PROTOCOL COLON INSUFFLATOR - 6400 Back to Search Results
Lot Number 50704075
Device Problem Air Leak (1008)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Date 09/18/2014
Event Type  No Answer Provided  
Event Description
Case received from a ct clinical specialist at (b)(6) on (b)(6) 2014 and forwarded to (b)(4)) on the same day.Additional info was obtained from the reporter directly at (b)(4) on (b)(4) 2014.A health professional reports: an (b)(6)-year-old female pt had undergone a colonoscopy on (b)(6) 2014 and the procedure could not be completed beyond 60 cm.Therefore, a ct colonography was performed with protoco2l administration set insufflator (lot number 50704075, serial number (b)(4)) on (b)(6) 2014.While the pt was supine on the table and co2 gas ran out the cylinder was changed and they proceeded with the examination.The pt well tolerated the examination, she did not have any pain and was asymptomatic.On the ct, the radiologist suspected a perforation with free air, however, the location could not be identified.The ct colonography also revealed extensive diverticular disease and looping of the colon which was considered the cause, why the colonoscopy had not been successful.The pt subsequently was admitted to the surgical unit for 6-7 days.The reporter did not consider there was a connection between the non-completed colonoscopy on (b)(6) 2014 and the suspected perforation.The reporter assessed the asymptomatic bowel perforation as related to the underlying diverticular disease.The insufflator was not used after this pt.Outcome: unk.Further info has been requested.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Company comments: an (b)(6)-year-old female pt with extensive diverticular disease underwent a colonoscopy for an unk indication.The procedure could not be completed due to both pt's underlying disease and formation of loops in colon during the procedure.Therefore, 12 days after the pt underwent a ct colonoscopy with protoco2l.During the ct following co2 insufflation, free air outside of the colon was seen leading to the diagnosis of suspected bowel perforation.No info on total amount of gas, maximum pressure used during the procedure and duration on the procedure is available.As the pt had no clinical symptoms neither during the examination nor subsequently to this investigation, the clinical picture is unlikely for a serious bowel perforation he event was assessed as pt related by the reporter.Bracco agrees that the extensive diverticular disease in this elderly pt could have favored this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTOCOL ADMIN SET
Type of Device
PROTOCOL COLON INSUFFLATOR - 6400
Manufacturer (Section D)
EZEM
532 broadhollow rd
melville NY 11747
Manufacturer (Section G)
EZEM
532 broadhollow rd
melville NY 11747
Manufacturer Contact
259 prospect plains rd
bldg h
monro twp, NJ 08831
8002575181
MDR Report Key4202121
MDR Text Key5037115
Report Number2411512-2014-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEI
PMA/PMN Number
K030854
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/18/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/17/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Lot Number50704075
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/18/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-