• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ZIV6-35-125-7-100-PTX
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Surgery, prolonged (2177)
Event Date 07/02/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(4); study pt (b)(6).Procedure was the left distal sfa, with mild calcification, tasc i type b, 3 prov lesion was 60 mm in length.On the day of the procedure, per ae form of study "there was a new cutoff in the mid peroneal artery, which reconstituted via strong collaterals in the distal segment." treatment included thrombectomy.The pt was discharged the same day.The study site has indicated the device did not malfunction or deteriorate in characteristics or performance.The study site has also indicated that this ae event was possible related to the device, but most definitely related to the study procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k)#: s001.(b)(4).No device malfunction has been reported.However intervention (thrombectomy) was performed during the procedure.The user has indicated that this ae was possibly related to the device but most definitely related to the procedure.Adopting a conservative approach this event will be mdr reported to the fda based on use of the device leading to surgical intervention.The device involved in this complaint is ziv6-35-125-7-100-ptx, lot number c979743.The stent was implanted int he pt and therefore is not available for return/evaluation.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.As the device was not available for evaluation and the conditions of use cannot be replicated in a laboratory setting it is not possible to determine a root cause for this complaint.As per information received, the device did not malfunction or deteriorate in characteristics or performance.The pt was discharged on the same day.From the information provided it is more likely that the ae injury reported for this complaint was caused due to the study procedure and not due to the ptx stent.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the relevant manufacturing records for zilver ptx and zilver ptx drug eluting stent revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.The complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
limerick
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
tracy o'sullivan, unk
61334440
MDR Report Key4203303
MDR Text Key16175695
Report Number3001845648-2014-00203
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100022
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/24/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/23/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2015
Device Catalogue NumberZIV6-35-125-7-100-PTX
Device Lot NumberC979743
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/02/2014
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received09/25/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/07/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
-
-