• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Sticking (1597)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Discomfort (2330)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This report is being filed after subsequent review of the following journal article.A simple technique for removing a locking compression plate with a stripped locking screw.Kim, seok-jung., kim, min-up., j orthop trauma, volume 26, number 6, june 2012.This is a retrospective review of 2 patients and a straightforward technique to remove a locking compression plate (lcp) and screw with a stripped hexagonal recess.Locking compression plates (lcp; synthes, (b)(4)) are now widely viewed as the standard method for fracture treatment, and some promising clinical reports support this trend.However, along with their increased use, some of their limitations are also becoming evident, especially those regarding their removal.Therefore, we describe a simple, effective method of removing a locking compression plate with a stripped locking screw.If the hexagonal recess of the screw had been stripped during attempts at screw removal using a conical extraction device, we perform the following procedure after loosening the contact surface between the bone and the plate.Using a larger drill bit, another hole is drilled immediately adjacent to the screw through the non-locking portion of the combination hole.The plate is struck along the line connecting the screw to the newly formed hole.Using an elevator, leverage force is then applied to the plate, which can be removed with the stripped screw attached.This technique can be used to remove plates with several stripped screws and does not require any special tools.This report is for a (b)(6) female patient who had a distal tibia fracture and open reduction and internal fixation.One year postoperatively, the patient elected to undergo implant removal as a result of discomfort over the medial malleolus.Removal of the lcp was performed; however, one of the locking screws was stripped.The stripped screw and plate were successfully removed using the described technique.This report is 3 of 4 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown locking compression plate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not for diagnosis.A simple technique for removing a locking compression plate with a stripped locking screw.Kim, seok-jung., kim, min-up., j orthop trauma, volume 26, number 6, june 2012.This report is for an unknown (unknown plate/unknown quantity/unknown lot.(b)(6).Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PLATE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4210214
MDR Text Key4984420
Report Number2520274-2014-14025
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/29/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/02/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
-
-